Perplexed, yet unguided

...perhaps I was not in the right frame of mind for this book. Some of the writing was luminous with truths, but I was perpetually lost and disoriented.
The narration/performance was quite good with the exception of the child Talli(sp?) and her father.

1 person found this helpful

Pretty good overall

I thoroughly enjoyed the story but the narration was just ok (the whole thing was brought down a notch by how annoying the performance was for one of the character’s that’s a child).

1 person found this helpful

This is a book that I continue to think about.

If you could sum up A Guide for the Perplexed in three words, what would they be?

Original Intriguing Concepts

Did the plot keep you on the edge of your seat? How?

Yes, it is a scary believable story, that has stuck with me years later.

Which character – as performed by Carrington MacDuffie – was your favorite?

Josie Ashkenazi

Any additional comments?

Concepts such as sibling rivalry taken to whole new levels.

1 person found this helpful

Too contrived

There are several themes in this book, among them sibling relationships and memory vs. history. Several sets of siblings are depicted, the prevalent ones being the sisters Josie and Judith, whose relationship makes a good case for having an only child. At the very end, there is Josie's daughter and her younger sister. There are also Maimonides and his brother, Solomon Schechter and his twin brother, and the twin sisters who first brought the Cairo Geniza to the attention of Solomon Schechter. The author attempts to weave together three stories - one of Maimonides, one of Solomon Schechter, and one of the contemporary Judith and Josie, Josie's spouse Itamar, and their daughter Tali. I found the interweaving of these stories too contrived. My guess is that the author thought it is a clever device, but I found that making a connection between modern-day software, called Geniza, where the purpose of the software is to keep record and catalog of all details about a person's life a rather weak ploy to then connect to the story of Solomon Schechter and his recovery of documents from the Cairo Geniza. The connection to Maimonides is even weaker - one of the documents found in the Cairo Geniza was a letter Maimonides wrote following his brother's death. So now we have a connection to another famous pair of siblings, with a very different relationship from that of Judith and Josie. But what exactly is the relevance of this to the main story? Not anything of substance, really. Putting a copy of a Hebrew translation of Maimonides Guide for the Perplexed into the main story was also very contrived and not very credible - Josie just happened to find it in the Alexandria library, and her captor just happened to allow her to keep it in the cell she was chained in. Since I am very familiar with the available historical record (vs. fictionalized accounts) of Maimonides' life and of Solomon Schechter, I found these secondary stories to be like padding in the main story, though I recognize that many, probably most, readers are not familiar. But was the purpose merely educational? I don't know. The main story itself did have suspense and does keep you wanting to hear more - interruptions with the secondary stories seemed to be just that: interruptions. The other prevalent theme is memory, and the question of how important is it that it be close to reality. This is an interesting question. We all know, for example, that people are promoted after they die. They are almost always more righteous, loving, giving, etc. than in real life. Is this a good thing? Sometimes. It is good to keep the best recollections, sometimes. But sometimes, turning a blind eye to something troubling prevents righting a wrong. Was it good for Tali to be deluded at the end about the relationship between her mother and her aunt? I'm not sure. Are historians wrong in trying to correct misconceptions about the past, when new evidence is discovered, or perhaps when hidden or sealed records are finally made available to the public? I don't think so. These are questions that perhaps one could discuss after reading this book.
I found the narrator to be mediocre. Some of the voices and accents were good (I think the two sisters in Cambridge were the best), but some were rather amateurish sounding. The narrator definitely needed some work on her Hebrew. Some words she got quite well, but others were poorly pronounced, and I don't get why it is so difficult to find a native speaker who could record proper pronunciation for a narrator to practice before recording. Because I speak Hebrew, I found it particularly annoying to hear, for example, Moshay all the time for Moshe (Maimonides). But when she said the name in French, Moise, it was really pathetic - there is a website pronouncenames.com and she should have checked. She pronounced it like the French moi followed by a z, rather than the way it is pronounced (mo-eeze, sort of, but not exact, because English vowels are different from French vowels). The narration did not measure up at all to some of the great narrators that we sometimes can hear in books from Audible. And the book did not measure up, either. It was entertaining, mostly, but there are so many books out there, this does not belong high on your list.

1 person found this helpful

so much promise left on the floor

I did not care for the narrator. While most words were pronounced correctly, there was something in her cadence and manner that put a damper on the story for me.

I liked the various stories but was shocked when the book was suddenly over. Seriously left shaking my head. Ok, I get that the past was being repeated. But to leave us at that spot? Why?

And the stores of Solomon Schecter and his discoveries and his relationship with his brother - there was so much more to tell to tie all of the stories together.

This story had so much potential. as written, I cannot recommend it. What a shame!

Would not recommend. Had potential.

What could have made this a 4 or 5-star listening experience for you?

A reader who could pronounce the words correctly. It was tremendously grating to hear her say the name Moshe, as "Mo Shay". Likewise for Shiva, and a host of other words. This was the wrong narrator for this text.

What was most disappointing about Dara Horn’s story?

The story had no interesting develpments. Turned out to be trite, unsophisticated pablum. Such a shame.

How could the performance have been better?

The narrator did not pronounce Jewish, Hebrew, or Yiddish words anywhere near correctly. A terrible narrator selection for this book.

You didn’t love this book... but did it have any redeeming qualities?

There were several elements to the book which had potential to be fulfilling, but sadly, the work turned out the be a tremendous disappointment.

Any additional comments?

I cannot believe this was a PJ library adult selection. Usually, the PJ library books for kids are excellent. Terrible disappointment.

Left Me Feeling Perplexed

I have very much enjoyed Dara Horn's other books and even attended a writing conference where she spoke and so I was really looking forward to this novel. I plowed through it, hoping that my opinion would change, but it did not. I could not connect with any of the characters and did not feel that the Josie/Judy saga ended with the spiritual insight of the Joseph story. Instead, it seemed more like an outlandish soap opera. In addition, the three parallel plots did not meld well together and moving from one to the other felt jarring. I was really interested in Maimonides and the Guide for the Perplexed, but was disappointed that this was not explored with greater depth (ie: Josie toying with these philosophical concepts at greater length). I suspect a better editor would have helped to make this a more powerful piece of writing. I usually like Carrington MacDuffie, but I think she was miscast for this book.

2 people found this helpful