Am Epic Original SciFi Read Worth Your Time...

Would you recommend this audiobook to a friend? If so, why?

I'm cautious as to what I recommend, because recommendations in anything defines us in those with whom we associate. With that in mind, I only recommend audiobooks/book that captivate me, that are truly original in scope and idea. No middle ground. No gray area. In this case, I'd recommend this audiobook to anyone, ESPECIALLY my friends. Eon brings together alternate dimensions, aliens, Armageddon, warfare, character conflict and culture clash together brilliantly. AND it's a series??? Most excellent.

What did you like best about this story?

It grows almost exponentially as you read it. Once you HAVE read it, you'll know exactly whatI mean. The scope and ramifications of the story reach out further and consequences become more severe and dramatic as the story unfolds. This ALWAYS makes for a good story, and remember, it's ALL about the story. And NO, I'm NOT giving anything away.

What three words best describe Stefan Rudnicki’s performance?

Clear, pace-setting, restrained.

Was there a moment in the book that particularly moved you?

SO many moments in this read stood out, but one in particular was when Lanier is simply overwhelmed by the sheer scope, the magnitude, of the technological capabilities of the Stone's inhabitants and societies. The technology borders on seeming magical at certain points, because of the almost limitless scope of what can be done by everyday people in this society. Imagine what a Neanderthal would think of a microwave, a television, running water, or photography. WOW. How's that for a descriptive word of what you'll encounter as you read this for yourself? You'll discover what they discover, and you'll enjoy the journey.

Any additional comments?

Any review I write in this depth or greater is due to PASSION. You'll see that the books, authors, and narrators I dislike will have short to the point epitaph-style reviews. Not this audiobook. I cannot recommend it enough. This book will require you to think. Yes, that's right, I wrote THINK. It doesn't mean that you will not understand this book. It's easy to understand. What you'll have to think about are ideals. Things like politics, societal norms erased, eternity, religion, the human condition. Wait, wait, wait...It's a great, fun read, and not lofty, so rest easy. Enjoy the book. Find others who have read it, and have fun tearing ideals apart. You'll be better for it, and be glad you read this book. I know I am.

24 people found this helpful

Enjoyable solid Si Fi-30 years old- still topical

I first read "Eon" when it was published in 1985 - and was fascinated by the concept and ideas detailed in this long and complicated novel. Especially complicated for me since I'm not a physics or mathematics specialist. I had to take the theories as SF drama and let it go at that.

Listening to the book after such a long time was rewarding and equally fascinating. The character development is involved and up to Greg Bears usual fastidious work...plot development is intricate and convoluted at times but well done and the final chapters unexpected.

If you've read it and are looking for serious SF to listen to, give "Eon" another try. If this 3 book trilogy is new to you than "Eon" is the place to start.

Enjoy.

20 people found this helpful

Eons Long

IF HE COULD ONLY EXPLAIN THE SIMPLE THINGS
Bear took on more then he could write about in this saga. Full of lots of mind blowing physics, math and science, the story was just too broad and complicated for Bear to explain. I first read this over 30 years ago. At the time I could barely understand it, but in my youth I felt compelled to finish every book I started and I did. Now that I am older, more mature, and better read, I thought I would try again with the help of Stefan Rudnicki. I still could not wrap my mind around it or find much entertaining in this future text book. I could blame myself for not being the scientific genius, it takes to enjoy this diatribe or I could blame Bear for not being a good enough writer to give it life. I blame Bear and I am not going to listen to no boring book. I quit early on this and advise you not to start.

17 people found this helpful

Great Sci-Fi

What made the experience of listening to Eon the most enjoyable?

Stefan Rudnicki. Enough said. And the fact there's a whole faction based on Ralph Nader... Naderites. LOL!

What did you like best about this story?

The way the author used time and space, and avoided paradox. The technology and physics were really far out, but not so far that you felt 'no way, this is just some guy writing while tripping'.

What about Stefan Rudnicki’s performance did you like?

Stefan Rudnicki. Enough said.

Any additional comments?

I bought this book in hard copy when I was 15. When I saw Stefan was reading it, I had to pick it up, and was glad I did.... I usually listen to books while I work, however, you really need full attention with this one, because it's jam packed with time/space technology that if you miss the explanation of it it will hurt you in the long run.

12 people found this helpful

OMG! Like Counting Grains Of Sand!!

Dull? No, dull's a quantum leap.... UP from "EON". Who cares about these people? Who cares about exhausting cinematic description IN A BOOK? Get ready for every detail of Greg Bear's imaginary friends? Okay, one of the powers of SciFi is exploring the fantasy worlds of good writers. Bear's not one of them. Maybe if he was better edited? There's a magic word that someone should whisper in his ear..... "pace."

Did I mention that this is really long... and feels longer? Unless I need sleep, I'll not finish EON nor read another of these hard-to-Bear stories..... ZZZZZZZZzzzzz!

7 people found this helpful

Ingenious, Thought-provoking, Imaginative

What made the experience of listening to Eon the most enjoyable?

The physics and mathematical puzzles related the Stone.

What was one of the most memorable moments of Eon?

The realization of the true nature of the Stone and the imaginative delights and puzzles of its inhabitants and the world they inhabit.

What does Stefan Rudnicki bring to the story that you wouldn’t experience if you just read the book?

An emotional dimension.

Was this a book you wanted to listen to all in one sitting?

No, it's better to linger.

Any additional comments?

Suspend your disbelief: ignore the time the story takes place, pretend the Cold War has not ended. Immerse yourself in Bear's imaginative universe, and you'll be amply rewarded.

6 people found this helpful

Old favorite, marred by sexism

TL; DR, it was too late to return this book, so every time the book engaged in sexist garbage writing, I skipped to the next chapter. I'm sure I missed some plot, but it was overall better this way.

Before going to space, star scientist Patricia Vasquez visits her economically disadvantaged family in Southern California. I'm glad Greg Bear is acknowledging that genius doesn't respect socioeconomic boundaries and all that, especially for a book written in 1984. This would have been a good part of the book for Egan to get into the young protagonist's background. Was it hard for Patricia's parents to come to grips with the enormity of their daughter's genius? How did she get into schools and programs that could support her to such a degree that she was in college by her mid teens? What was her early childhood like?

This depiction of the Vasquez family though, seemed heavy handed and shallow, focusing on the literal crutches, and the poor quality of the furniture. Isn't there some term for when you assume the reader won't identify with a character, so you write them a bit more as an object than as a person? Objectifi-something. Anyway.

Greg Bear is at his best extrapolating a cold war going hot after extending into the 2000s, and his plot is a good one when read as an alternate history. The Russian foil is well-written and an interesting character, not terribly stereotyped. Bear is not at his best imagining women as full human beings. To be fair, there is at least one woman in this book (Federal commissioner Judith Hoffmann) who is overweight and not conventionally attractive. I know this, because the narrator made sure to use that specific wording when first describing her.

"Objectification." That's the word.

I started finally just skipping past the sexist bits at chapter 40, when NASA administrator Gary Lanier is somehow able to talk a Chinese scientist (who just happens to have western parents) into having sex with him, around other people, in a helicopter, two days after nuclear armageddon. That was enough.

It was especially disappointing, because I had just finished listening to Dune, written a fully twenty years earlier. And that book is a masterpiece, and not once did any jarringly sexist prose knock me out of the story. And the story in Eon is a good story, hurt by bad writing, and I'm writing this review (instead of appreciating the story) because of bad writing. "Product of its time" is an explanation, not an excuse.

5 people found this helpful

Too far to slog for no payoff

Sorry but I just don't see what's so great about this one. We'll ignore for the moment the blatant Clarke Rama ripoff. It starts "well", though the Rama aspect is foremost in my mind as it starts, but I would say that after the halfway point, when the obligatory "Hollywood" shootemup military assault happens, too much of interest is shunted aside in favor of dealing with that, and boring political crap.

Were I editor, I would have told Bear, and all writers currently, take the military and political crap out, take the guns out and do something creative and different, and use the time better developing and explaining the really wondrous aspects of the ideas. I'm bored with unnecessary explosions etc. Do something imaginative. So much of import, i.e., Who built it, How, Why, How does it all work, etc., is passed over briefly if at all. Not to mention elements that start to verge on magic. Scrap that crap. I guess we can learn (maybe) some of these answers in next book. NOT Interested.

So many SF writers have great ideas, but they're terrible writers; they need editors not to mention learning some craft. Here's a good example from Eon: "What happened next, happened so fast Patricia could hardly follow it." Don't tell me something is going to happen, just show it, I'll know it happens next, because it happens next. Don't dilute surprise, destroy suspense, let it happen. This is a simple quick fix that so many authors need to learn. This is just one of a plethora of bad writing examples. Describe visually, explain with similes and metaphors. So much of this novel is lacking stylistically. No poetry here. I will be first to admit Clarke's Rama isn't well written stylistically, but at least he keeps revealing wonders.

And the characters in this are just cardboard. And of course there's the obligatory "we have to shut it down immediately" race against time so overused by everyone. And the also obligatory "throw some sex scenes in" are laughable, thankfully there are only a couple.

Just bored with this type of stuff. Could have been mind bending. I'm sure many others will love this one, I wanted more.

4 people found this helpful

Still holds up well

I first read Eon as a teenager, and was quite obsessed with its extremely detailed and imaginative worlds. I was curious to see if I'd still like it today, and I was pleased to find that it was just as engaging and mind-expanding as I'd remembered.

The most thrilling parts of the novel are the opening scenes, as the characters explore the multi-chambered Stone, gradually learning its secrets, and then travel further down the infinite Corridor; there's a tremendous sense of an journey toward greater and greater discovery. The final chapter is a brilliant twist that ends the novel perfectly with a beautiful reworking of its themes.

Of course, the novel's Cold War politics and its depictions of astronaut-soldiers in the year 2000 now seem extremely dated, but fortunately this is a novel about alternate universes, so one can simply pretend that the story takes place in a different universe than ours...

The human side of things isn't quite as good; Bear's handling of the romantic subplots is rather stilted and sometimes the characters seem a little too unflappable in the face of universe-changing events. But these aren't major problems, and there is often some emotional intensity in the scenes in which characters are yearning for home, or discovering that everything they knew was wrong.

I was briefly taken aback by the narrator's ridiculously manly voice (it's like being read to by Barry White), but I got used to it rapidly and he's very good at distinguishing the characters.

4 people found this helpful

Best science fiction novel ever

Would you recommend this audiobook to a friend? If so, why?

What a fantastic story, this would make a fantastic movie. This is a book you cannot put down.

3 people found this helpful