Great Book, Narrator Isn't the Best though

Would you listen to July 1914: Countdown to War again? Why?

Yes, most likely in July 2014 for the 100th anniversary of the start of WWI.

What did you like best about this story?

This book goes into more detail than the Guns of August about the actual start of the war, specifically, the 34 days between Franz Ferdinand's assassination and the attack by Austria-Hungary on Serbia.

What aspect of Steve Coulter’s performance would you have changed?

A major problem with the narrator is that he isn't pronouncing the German names right. He pronounces von Moltke's name wrong. When he first said "Molt," I actually stopped listening and thought "Who the Hell is 'Molt?'" It's pronounced mɔltkə, two syllables.

Did you have an extreme reaction to this book? Did it make you laugh or cry?

Not particularly.

Any additional comments?

Audible Inc. needs to make sure that their narrators have cheat sheets to pronounce names right. It can really throw you off when you hear a name pronounced wrong like Moltke.

6 people found this helpful

Polemic masquerading as scholarship

What disappointed you about July 1914: Countdown to War?

The July Crisis makes for an exciting story and this is a well written account. Unfortunately it is also an essentially false account. McMeekin makes a number of assertions to support his Russian guilt thesis that are flat out wrong. Just to give one example, the story about the Kaiser's greeting of Bethmann Holweg on July 27 is based on Bulow's memoirs but has been shown to be an invention by Albertini and others. The sad fact is that readers unfamiliar with the intricate details of the July Crisis will be seriously mislead by this book.

What reaction did this book spark in you? Anger, sadness, disappointment?

Disappointed that such a seriously flawed book is taken as an accurate account of the July Crisis by so many people.

4 people found this helpful

Modern research and conclusions of an old topic

Who was to blame for WW1? In a refreshingly balanced book, McMeekin does a fine job unravelling the events of July 1914 and provides enough facts to blame everyone. The degrees of blame are left to the reader, along with the blend of incompetence and malevolence. Should be mandatory reading for anyone with an interest in the subject, and a perfect antidote for McMillan and Hastings's retreads on the blank check and Kaiser's personality disorders.

Not overly long, but it is intense and I found myself re-playing sections multiple times. It helps to have a grasp of the protagonists and the sequence of events beforehand. There are many, and the book isn't gentle - definitely not the best book to use as an introduction to the topic, but rather an excellent work to destroy existing preconceptions on the 20th century's defining moments.

3 people found this helpful

An exciting story, indifferently read

Would you listen to July 1914: Countdown to War again? Why?

Yes, there are many details in the story that are worth rehearing.

What other book might you compare July 1914: Countdown to War to and why?

The Guns of August. They are both good narratives, but this is more current

What aspect of Steve Coulter’s performance would you have changed?

He needs to research the correct pronunciation of names. For example, "Choristers Bridge," the shorthand name for the Russian foreign office, is pronounced with a silent "h." Many other names are mispronounced, but that one grates.

Did you have an extreme reaction to this book? Did it make you laugh or cry?

No.

Any additional comments?

It is a very valuable corrective to the standard interpretation, which places the heaviest portion of the blame for the start of WWI on the Central Powers, especially Germany. It is clear that blame must be more widely apportioned, and that the Dual Monarchy must be given a heavier portion.

3 people found this helpful

Great treatment of the subject

I have ready many books about WWI and firmly believe this is the best modern one about the origins of the war. The best older one being Tuchman of course. A good antidote to some of the more recent works trying to pin all of the blame on one side. Very balanced. The author also has great narrative skills. I could not put it down and highly recommend it.

1 person found this helpful

Illuminating

If you could sum up July 1914: Countdown to War in three words, what would they be?

Illuminating, convincing, important

Who was your favorite character and why?

Istvan Tisza, the Hunagrian prime minister. He was one of the very few clear-sighted players, and an admirable man (he resigned in 1917 and joined the army to experience what it is like on the front lines; assassinated by Soviet collaborators in 1918, none of whom came to a good end — one, József Pogány, aka John Pepper, ended up tortured and executed by Stalin after agitating in the U.S.). Unfortunately, his efforts to stave off aggression toward Serbia only stalled it and made impossible a contained war against Serbia, which might not have led to a world war.

Have you listened to any of Steve Coulter’s other performances before? How does this one compare?

His reading is not nearly as bad as some reviewers pretend. I found it good in general. It is true that he mispronounces some foreign words, e.g. Caillaux should sound like Ka yo (as in yoyo), not Kay yo, because the 'i' forms a phonic unit with 'll' that follows and not with the preceding 'ca'; the German word Kriegsgefahrzustand should have the accent on Krieg with a secondary accent on "zu" (pronounced 'tzoo'), and not on -fahr). But such instances, though annoying, are few enough not to bo overly distracting, and I have alas come across few audiobooks where foreign names are pronounced well or even correctly. Here most names come out correctly, and I can think of none that is unrecognizable (contrary to one reviewer's objection, the name Moltke is properly pronounced).

If you were to make a film of this book, what would the tag line be?

A Tragedy of Errors

Any additional comments?

I have long thought that Germany deserved the punishment the Versailles treaty imposed (which however does not justify the treaty's lack of insight and foresight). This book, by providing a precise blow by blow account of the days leading up to the outbreak of war, shows clearly that Germany did not plan or intend this war but ended up appearing to have started it through Russian (and to some extent French) trickery together with its own minister Theobald von Bethmann-Hollweg's ineptitude. McMeekin's account elucidates (by being sufficiently detailed, and by incorporating evidence that has come to light in recent years) how such a monstrous war came about and the responsibility each player bore.However, if I can no longer think of Germany as responsible for starting the war, I do think Germany bears the blame for the atrocities in Belgium, and above all, for continuing the war after the slaughter took on monstrous proportions (9 million soldiers killed with as many civilians): the Germany army was in France after all, which means Germany could have decided to pull out (as the French could not). Russia pulling out in 1917 could have ended the war if Germany had been willing to use the opportunity. But there the 'logic' of war prevailed, not concern for humanity or even the good of the country and its people. From the French point of view, it was certainly just (though not exactly smart) to make Germany pay for the monumental damage France suffered. Of course it looked different from the viewpoint of Germans, especially those who knew how Germany had been drawn into war. The tricky and/or obtuse players who brought about the war did more than bring ruin and death to their countries and citizens; their short-sighted gamesmanship and ineptitude were ultimately responsible for Hitler, possibly the Bolshevik revolution, and the subsequent hell whose flames flared terrifyingly twenty years later and are still singeing us today.

1 person found this helpful

Must read to understand WWI

My favorite book on WWI

One has to read this to even attempt at getting their heads around WWI

1 person found this helpful

A different view of the origins of WWI

Would you consider the audio edition of July 1914: Countdown to War to be better than the print version?

Probably not. In theory the structure of the book should be really well suited for an audiobook. The events of July of 1914 make for such a dramatic and gripping story. With many non-fiction books it's easy to phase out while listening, and then realize you've have no recollection of the last 15 minutes of the book. There's no danger of that here. But the constant mispronunciation of names is grating, and a real problem.

What was one of the most memorable moments of July 1914: Countdown to War?

The most interesting bits to me were the handling of the crisis in France and Russia. The pre-planned French Balkan Inception scenario, the aggressive stance of Poincare during the StP meeting, and the prepared plans and execution of the Russian mobilization (based on a hidden early mobilization while trying to prevent German mobilization for as long as possible via diplomacy). McMeekin's telling of these parts ends up painting a very different picture than the "standard" explanation where the German war council of 1912 is treated as the smoking gun.

But this isn't a one-sided book by any means. In the final analysis McMeekin seems happy to heap blame of the war on everyone involved. (Even the British, who if this book is to believed must have had one of the most gullible diplomatic corps and least effective foreign ministry of the era.)

Would you listen to another book narrated by Steve Coulter?

Maybe one that doesn't have difficult foreign words for him to mangle. It wasn't a bad narration otherwise.

1 person found this helpful

Glaring pronunciation problems

The narrator makes jarring repeated mistakes pronouncing names of people and places.

Quality control fell apart for this recording.

Eagerness to Blame

How many historical events have we learned incorrectly? Here is a perfect example when historians are willing, to make an honest effort, to put aside their bias we can begin to learn the otherside of the story. McMeekin makes a noble attempt to do just, with well developed arguments based on original sources. Whats most impressive is he is transparent, when he is surmising as to each actor's motives, this just adds credibility to his argument. If we agree or not, we should all welcome listening to facts that might fly in the face of what we currently believe. Let's try to stop blaming and demonizing others. We would be better off just trying to learn, from our past, in hopes of not duplicating are mistakes.