A Novel Approach (As Opposed to Novelistic)

I had to listen to this two or three times with half an ear before I appreciated Keegan's cunning arrangement of the story. It is not a straight narrative, does not compete directly with the 119-course meals of Shelby Foote and Bruce Catton. It does not arrange the story in a linear timeline like a choo-choo train (THIS happened and then THIS happened...). No, it's done in the style of a digressive essay, like a long book review. Keegan spends most of the first half dilating upon the topics that most interest him: 19th Century American culture in general, Southern civilization vs Northern, the variances in technological development, the astounding spottiness of topographical knowledge (basically, maps that were poor or nonexistent), the prosperity and ease of the old-stock middle class, and in general how strange and novel American civilization appeared to those from the Old World.

Perhaps only an English military historian could handle this with the detachment that Keegan shows. This is not to say he shows no biases at all; he definitely faults the South for being technologically deficient and maybe culturally backward; and he thinks the world of Abraham Lincoln. But this is just a function of using a book-review idiom, in which one accepts the conventional outlook overall, while reserving creative insight for one's one narrow and favorite specialties. Thus when discussing strategy in the many theaters of war, Keegan comes back again and again to his own pet methodologies, analyzing the problems of managing a war over a vast terrain that no one comprehended very well, and comparing the topographical problems of waging battles in Tidewater Virginia versus the campaigns in the trans-Appalachian West. Again and again it's mainly an issue of good maps and efficient geopolitical outlook, much as in the First World War.

The performance is pretty good. The mispronunciations of place names (mainly "Po-to-mack" for Potomac) is amusing and forgivable, given the British actor during the narration.

16 people found this helpful

Missing pages

What would have made The American Civil War better?

If the latter portion of page 124, the entirety of page 125 and the first portion of page 126 had been included in the audio. Instead, we're left with a comment about Grant being great at math and then he's suddenly confronted by Fort Donelson, with the entirety of his early career skipped (it's in the book, just not the audio).

Would you ever listen to anything by John Keegan again?

Yes

9 people found this helpful

An excellent look at the American Civil War

John Keegan is one of my favorite authors of military history and I have read many of his books, including his biography of Winston Churchill which was a bit of a change for him. All were excellent - well written, interesting and informative - and this book is no exception. It was one of many histories of this period that I have read, but it had its own unique approach and much that I had not seen in other books.

In particular I found his analysis of the generalship of the various commanders extraordinarily interesting and something that I had not seen in other books. As a young boy growing up and attending public school I always heard about how great a general Robert E Lee was and how poor a general Ulysses Grant was and it has been interesting to see how the more recent books on the US Civil War have changed that view. As I read more books on the subject my view of the generalship of the various figures in the war changed and it became clear to me how the earlier views taught in public schools were generally uninformed.

Mr Keegan covers all of the major battles of the war and the political background of both the North and South and as a military historian he explains why this or that action was important and what effect it had. He also covers the use of freed slaves by the North and their proposed use by the South as well and how Grant's overall strategy was the only war winning strategy proposed by any general or politician during the war. His comments on Grant, Sherman, Lee, Jackson and others are especially interesting.

The narration is excellent and I recommend this book to anyone interested in reading about the US Civil War, regardless of whether they know much or little of the war.

2 people found this helpful

Another outstanding effort

Everything by Keegan is outstanding and this is no different. Well worth a listen if you have any interest at all in the subject.

5 people found this helpful

Straightforward, well organised, no revisionism

Most importantly, this well written, comprehensive survey of the Civil War is even handed. It is a perfect antidote to the 1619 nonsense.

1 person found this helpful

An amazing analysis of our Civil War from outside!

A dedicated student of the Civil War, I was fascinated & intrigued by Keegan's different view of the many events I've read & studied... hearing a different set of questions & discussions about a "known event" was amazing... yes, I listened to it 3 times in a row to scratch my head & research to points he discusses & I overlooked.. Wish I found it sooner!!

1 person found this helpful

Excellent overview of the Civil War.

Keegan does an admirable job of capturing the political and military circumstances that led to the outbreak of hostilities between north & south. He also discuss major battles and prominent individuals with enough detail to giver the listener/reader a good grasp of their character.

1 person found this helpful

Great military history, weak on the causes of the war

This was the first nonfiction book I ever read that wasn’t for a school assignment. I read it not long after it first came out in 2009, and I wanted to revisit it to see if my perspective on it had changed. As a single volume narrative on the military story of the war it’s still excellent. It loses a star for it’s less than stellar overview of some of the causes of the war. I feel like Keegan was at least indirectly influenced by the lost cause myth here and at times it made me cringe.

Voice performance good, audio parts missing

Randomly throughout this text, the audio skips portions of the text. Example at the 5:57:00 mark where we’re reading about Grant at West Point then, mid sentence, we’re back to Grant’s taking of Fort Henry only we’ve skipped entirely the part where he actually took Fort Henry and he “was left with” the other fort.

Lost Cause Garbage. Do Not Purchase!

I wish I could give it zero stars. Don’t waste your money. Book has a strong pro southern bias. It perpetuates the myth of happy, content slaves and benevolent slave Master. This garage has been dismissed by serious historians. The Author also portrays John Brown as a crazy man. Again, he is simply reading from the Lost Cause playbook. In addition to the Souther bias and factual errors, the writing is just plain bad. Also the narration is terrible and will put you to sleep.

On average, there has been a book published on the Civil War everyday since 1861. There are many good, fact based Civil War histories available on Audible. Choose on of them. Don’t waste your time on this one.