This series isn't worth the time investment or the paper it was written on.

All credit to the narrator for trying to bring this series to life.
This series could have been so good. The world is interesting, the characters should have had plenty of room to develop, and the action and drama could have been epic. Sadly the world is never fleshed out, the characters are unbelievably incompetent for people who have spent their entire lives training, and the action and drama is so one dimensional it hurts. Without going into spoilers I can only recommend that no one wastes their time on this. Maybe all of the good reviews are from people new to the genre, but this series is infuriatingly meaningless.

24 people found this helpful

4 Primary Crimes Committed By The Author

What did you like best about The Emperor's Blades? What did you like least?

This world has a very impressive military system. A great set of forces at play. But the author commits 4 crimes against the reader that need to be called out.1) "SURPRISE! THERE'S NO ENDING IN THIS BOOK! READ THE NEXT ONE TO FIND OUT HOW THIS STORY ENDS! JUST KIDDING! READ THE ONE AFTER THAT!" These are not books. They are chapters. That is to say, they END by way of the author simply halting his writing, without the resolution of a story, let alone the primary story, and in fact, fail utterly to resolve any arc at all. - This should obviously come with a warning label since the three books combine to tell a single story. Not a single story with 3 major advents in between... just a single story. Period. - The three novels before you, are not a trilogy. They are a single book. Know this. 2) The plot is moved forward through characters being suddenly and inexplicably unintelligent and inarticulate and essentially, volunteering for victim duty. - This happens regularly and without justification. "I insist on going with you into danger, where I will get in the way because I will then be able to watch the fight as a spectator. Yet 10 pages later I will in fact present the exact opposite argument regarding the same exact fight in the same location citing zero circumstantial change because I clearly just needed a reason to be in this building."3) Repeatedly reviewing one's own circumstances aloud with a tone of wonder and awe... is lazy and ineffectual. This is the dark side of the Show-Not-Tell relationship between characters and the audience. If you SHOW the audience an awe-inspiring thing, they will feel awe. Telling the audience to feel awe by reviewing how shockingly implausible the character's survival is or how far they've come since they left Default-Village-Land 5 times is like having the author tell you he thinks you can't remember the last 3 hours to your face. I find self-review for the purpose of INFORMING the audience that they have experienced drama and not to forget it... to be repulsive.4) Repetition. - The sort of repetition that happens when an author only has one tool at his disposal. In this case it's the phrase: "If he was frightened by the giant warrior before him... he didn't show it." "If she was bothered by the weapons being brandished around her... she didn't show it." "If he was frightened by this ___ he didn't show it." Seriously. I'm guessing 30 or 40 times? ... If she was bla bla bla... LET ME GUESS! She didn't show it!?

How would you have changed the story to make it more enjoyable?

I would have taken the time necessary to make the primary female character morally consistent.

What about Simon Vance’s performance did you like?

The reader was flawless.

Did The Emperor's Blades inspire you to do anything?

No.

274 people found this helpful

Of the various new fantasy series, this is... fine

I like the Emperor's Blades, but, given the many new epic fantasy series of the past few years, this isn't at the top of the list. It is clearly in the grimdark (Ambercrombie, not Rothfuss) camp - horrible events, moral ambiguity, lots of death and fighting. While not bad, it doesn't seem to add much interesting to the genre, and has some questionable choices.

Some of the questionable choices are worldbuilding. While there are lots of nice touches (sky ninjas on giant birds!) a lot of the rest falls somewhere between cliche and nonsensical. On the cliche side, this book mostly consists of the training of two different heirs to the throne. One is being trained in a monastery with (surprise!) taciturn, koan-spouting monks and has to find the meaning of their zen-like lessons. The other is being given hardcore military training with (surprise!) taciturn, tough-as-nails officers and has to overcome bullies and physical challenges. On the nonsensical side, apparently neither of the heirs to the throne are trained in anything having to do with ruling the empire that they are inheriting. Instead, they are subject to conditions that, for no really good reason, seem designed to have a very good chance of killing them.

The other questionable choices have to do with tone. There is a third member of the royal family, a daughter. She, like many of the women in the novel, gets a lot less time on the page. And most of the women we encounter get abused, tortured, or worse. It adds to a sense of discomfort throughout the novel.

Nothing here is awful, and the reading is great, but the book seemed rather forced, with motivations seeming muddled and the world not really cohering into a whole. The action was often well-done, but I think there are better new fantasy series to read.

176 people found this helpful

Doesn't compare with other fantasy books

I wanted to like this book very badly. It has a good writing style and interesting characters. The world is interesting. But it has several flaws--not fatal flaws, but serious nonetheless.

First is the completely gratuitous use of profanity and oaths. If you have read my reviews I seldom, if ever, complain about that unless it's supposed to be a YA or children's book. But everyone in this book swears like a truck-driver. It's like they are all in middle school. Part of the problem is that the author mixes the f-word and other words we know with many made-up oaths, like Kent-kissing etc. And everyone ALWAYS say Kent-kissing (Kent being a god). ALL OF THE TIME. I listen on my phone and if I heard someone say that one more time, I was going to throw it across the room! Argh!

The next problem comes with the plot itself. It's the story of three teenage or young-adult siblings who are dealing with life after the death of their Emperor father, although the two sons don't find out until well into the book.

One (a son) has been at a monastery for 8 years and seems only to be taught the really important skills he will need as the next Emperor in the last several months of being there when it's almost too late. Why? No explanation.

The next sibling (another son) has been in elite military training for 8 years. He seems to have fairly poor skills as well. After 8 years you would think he would be fairly good at some sort of military skill. It's not military school. This training is supposed to be like Navy Seal training. Other members are excellent at things like archery. Not him.

Hey, Emperor Dad: I don't think these 8-year plans are working!

That brings us to the third sibling (a girl). She has been with her father all of this time. She has learned the ins and outs of life in court. She knows all of the important players in the government. She makes some mistakes but it seems like she might make a good queen. But girls can't be queen. Only males can be Emperor. She was my favorite sibling even though she takes up maybe 5% of the book. Too bad. I hope that she is more featured in the sequels.

At various times I wanted to give this book 3 stars and maybe even 4 stars. But then I think of other books I have read this year and this book just does not compare with Robert V. S. Redick's or Daniel Abraham's stories. Or Shawn Speakman's debut novel. Never mind 5-star writers like Robin Hobb or Michael J. Sullivan. I gave them 4/5 stars so I couldn't bring myself to give this book more than 2.5.

The reader is very good, especially when reading the evil characters (for whatever reason). He helped make the book better.

But will I read the sequel? Um...um...um. I don't know! Possibly. I do like the characters and the world is interesting. But I'm not sure it will be worth my time and money.

91 people found this helpful

The pace of the story dragged it down.

As far as stories goes, this has a very slow pace. It wasn't until the last few hours of the audiobook when the story really started to pick up and gain shape. Up until that point, there were just a multitude of cliché cliff hangers while the story switched from character to character.

12 people found this helpful

Twists and Turns, a Kent-Kissing good time!

Would you listen to The Emperor's Blades again? Why?

Well, I wouldn't mind, but the phrase Kent-kissing was a bit overused. Kent is short for one of the Gods, Ashkent, and is said as a curse by nearly everyone in the book. I had my fill of the Kent-kissing phrase; although I found it pretty funny, one Kent-kissing listen is enough!

What other book might you compare The Emperor's Blades to and why?

Not really a comparison, but the basis premise of the book is there's a very powerful family ruling the Empire. The Emperor and his line have glowing red eyes, believed touched by a god. The emperor sends his young children away, each to learn different skills - his eldest son to train with monks, the younger male to a brutal military order that fights on the wings & talons of giant hawk-like birds, and his daughter remains to study in the capital. Unbeknownst to the family, there's an ancient enemy brewing a plot that threatens them all.

This enemy, and other parts of the world, hold vast secrets going back ages that involve sorcery, evil monsters from who-knows-where (yet), and some people who are 'leaches.' Leaches can use very powerful magic, but only if their "well" of power is nearby. Each leach has a different well (a material). Leaches are largely mis-understood and shunned like lepers.

It's hard to compare a complex world, system, and plot-line which has proven to be very deep, intriguing, and fun to delve into.

What about Simon Vance’s performance did you like?

Vance is among the best - he has the ability to use perfect cadence, tone, and pitch. His female voices are a bit lacking, thus the 4 stars for him.

Was there a moment in the book that particularly moved you?

Moved? No. Shocked? Yes, there were at least two shocking moments. These moments made me care greatly about the Emperor's children and how they were going to get out of their predicaments.

Any additional comments?

For a first book from a newer fantasy author, this was a very skilled effort and I can't wait to get to the next book in the series...Intense action and a cool plot, highly recommended!

3 people found this helpful

Had potential but blew it.

The writer came up with an original story and interesting characters but was incapable of having them develop at all. Every time you thought they might grow, they didn't. Instead, they spent their time accidentally thinking in their heads for too long while people waited on them to respond to a basic question. They've all been training for years to be the best at their field and yet it's like they are complete novices that have learned nothing. I wanted to love this book and managed to stick around to the end but it just never improved and I left feeling like I'd wasted my time completely.

3 people found this helpful

Good beginning, good ending, bad middle.

The concept of the book is not bad (if you don't mind superimposing a modern worldview/culture on a pre industrial fictional civilization). Staveley starts and ends the story well, but the middle is kind o a mess with a disproportionate amount of time devoted to draconian military training rather than moving the plot forward. If he cut about 50,000 words it would be right on the money.

11 people found this helpful

so slow and boring

So slow and boring. Nothing ever happens, just taking and world building. We all know you need "some" world building but something has to happen at some point to be interesting. It reads more like a lecture about this other place rather than a remotely interesting story to be told

13 people found this helpful

So - So

While much of the world-building is somewhat unique, the consistently unappealing, unlikeable characters are tough to take through 3 books.

There are a couple of constants in this series (1) NO one trusts anyone else; so, lack of even the most obvious communication drives the plot from beginning to end and (2) the entire world seems built on a foundation of pain, suffering, killing, torture, horrible judgement, bad decisions etc etc etc. No joking when I say it nearly impossible to sympathize with any character.

The author also seems to have periods where he seems fixated with unnecessary activities - like peeling off scabs. Book 1 is the most interesting as it sets up the 3 siblings at the heart of the plot. Book 2 is entirely driven by the stupidity of those siblings. Book 3 redeems the story some, but veers too much toward making the villain(s) nearly omniscient. By hour 50+ of the series, you're just ready for it to end.

9 people found this helpful