Worthless

I have learned that when an Audible book begins with orchestral music in the background, it's probably going to be a loser. That's just a correlation I've observed, particular to my tastes only. I'll take the cake, don't need the frosting. Having moved through this initial melodic distraction and listening to the narrator's nauseating chirpy tone, things only worsened as he warbled on and on about animal behaviors of which I was already aware. And man, can he warble! The narration alone made this a loser.

But I gave it a chance, at least two hours' worth, coming to the conclusion that this worn-out material has already been well-presented by Richard Dawkins, Bobbi S. Low, Jared Diamond, Matt Ridley, and a plethora of others.

It's probably an acceptable primer for those who want to take their first peek into the cauldron of Homo Sapien's socials structure relative to other species. For me, this was a disappointing piece of work.

9 people found this helpful

Great presentation, Highly recommend

I liked the facts, but repeating most of them 3-4 times, 1/2 length perhaps could do.
By the end it all built up to insightful conclusions about our nature and prospects of human societies - strained.
Highly recommend.

5 people found this helpful

Important information fills gaps

_The Human Swarm_ by Mark W Moffett is the book I didn’t know I needed. It covers a topic that’s been missing from the discussion of human society, and the perspective it offers fills gaps in what I’ve learned from other books. Moffett covers the topic of anonymous societies—animal groups in which other animals are identified as “members” even by individuals that don’t know them personally. An Argentine ant, for example, can be accepted by other Argentine ants of its super-colony even hundreds of miles away from its origin, using scent as a marker of belonging. Likewise, Mohawk Indians were able to identify and welcome each other even when they didn’t know each other, thanks to their distinctive hairstyles. Moffett identifies a sort of social organization that is unusual in the animal kingdom but not unique to humans. A more common arrangement is a flock, herd, or nesting colonies, where individuals that don’t know each other get along, but that’s because no individuals are excluded. In intimate bands or families, by contrast, only individuals who know each other are welcome. For a small number of animal species, however, a society consists of individuals that can identify each other as “insiders” without knowing each other personally. This social organization is found among Argentine ants, scrub jays, and humans.

Perhaps it’s no coincidence that Moffett’s mentor was E O Wilson, the ant expert who revolutionized our understanding of human nature with his book _Sociobiology_ (1975). It’s humbling and exhilarating how much we can learn about human society by comparing and contrasting ourselves to ants. For my purposes, Moffett’s description of Argentine ants was worth the price of the book. Unlike other ant species, Argentine ants form super-colonies with multiple queens. In Argentina, these ants super-colonies are kept in check by the one thing that can stop them: other super-colonies of Argentine ants. In California, where the Argentines are an invasive species, they spread almost without limit. Again, their only limit is another invasive super-colony. The comparison to humans is elementary.

One of the revolutionary findings of contemporary psychology is that humans are “groupish”, as Jonathan Haidt puts it in his seminal book _The Righteous Mind_ (2012). Freud taught that humans are inherently selfish, but intellectuals of his day had no clear understanding of human evolution or prehistory. Now we understand that humans are innately social, a trait that we can trace back tens of millions of years to our early simian ancestors. Morality, as modern researchers contend, is an adaptation that helps us get along in groups of our peers. Moffett’s insights help us see this “tribalism” on the scale of anonymous societies. Sure, it’s easy to understand why people prefer their friends and kin over strangers, but this book illuminates the human practice of preferring people we don’t know provided they have the right hair styles, modes of dress, manner of speech, or other societal markers. This book unifies Haidt’s modern-day insights, the globe-spanning analysis of Francis Fukuyama’s _The Origins of Political Order_ (2011), and other big-picture books about the nature of human society and the human animal.

_The Human Swarm_ does an admirable job of surveying the topic on all levels: ants that are more or less specialized, spiders that impersonate ants to predate them, chimpanzee bands with their distinctive pant-hoots, bands of humans who know each other as kin, groups of human bands that cooperate across societal boundaries, groups of human bands that split to create new boundaries, and today’s bewildering mix of human populations. Just the information about whales and scrub jays make this book worth your time. Moffett knows that he is filling in the blanks left by previous ethologists and anthropologists, and this book is a trove of both big ideas and delightful details. Perhaps the most important information for understanding human societies is the material on non-state societies and the bands that compose them. Here we see the many ways that humans have marked membership in their societies and the xenophobia toward outsiders that was the default perspective.

Disclosure: E O Wilson is a fan of my children’s book, Grandmother Fish, so any friend of his is a friend of mine.

10 people found this helpful

a very excellent insight into human behavior

this book offers a very good perspective is a human behavior among small groups and large groups that include Nations and societies. It is a good perspective that should not be missed

2 people found this helpful

decent

I don't know if I would have compared this to Jared diamond or Harare thought it was a decent book

10 people found this helpful

A truly unique and profound look into the human condition

Living in these days of division, I’ve been trying to get my hands on as many books that combine multiple disciplines to make sense of what’s happening, and perhaps what may come in these times of seeming unrest and uncertainty.
The Human Swarm is filled with valuable insight from a man that dedicated his life to understanding societies of all sorts of species.
Moffett has a deep understanding of societies, and his honesty in laying open the human condition is admirable and beautiful.
If I had to recommend three books on similar topics, this would be on that list. I have read many books on similar topics.
An important note, in my opinion, is to be sure to read or listen to the very end. The most important information comes in the final third segment of this profound piece of work.
If you’re iffy about getting it, don’t be. Get it!

On society

An essential book on understanding the human animal, human nature, and the formation and future of our societies

The journey from chimp to human

This was one of those fascinating “guns germs and steel“ reads.

The author brings remarkable new information and his own compelling analysis to make a great book about our ever evolving human social structures.

weird.

very interesting concept on paper - thinking about human societies biologically.
in practice hard to follow especially because the books makes so many statements outside the realm of biological expertise (sociology, anthropology, psychology etc) - it feels like there are too many personal opinion tangents and they are not labeled as such.
the performance felt somewhat mechanical. the sound is very clear but there is a lack of emotional engagement from the reader that made it harder than other books in the space to listen through. sapiens is an easier listen, so is the weirdest people in the world, or the righteous mind.
still i am glad I did go through it there are many interesting perspectives.

Textbook

This could be a rather dry college freshman textbook, I suppose.

Has a few good nuggets, but often seems to be droning on about humans as if they were rather one-dimensional, not the richly exasperating animals we know and love.