Important Read and Story- Horrible Narrator

Would you say that listening to this book was time well-spent? Why or why not?

I enjoyed the narration by Mark Deakins of the first book of this trilogy so much I couldn't wait to listen to this title. Unfortunately, the narration of Theodore Rex is so poor it will make you angry and makes it difficult to comprehend or listen to all 25 hours. The narration is not up to Audible standards and does not do justice to the great content. In my opinion, Audible owes anyone who purchased this title an apology and a refund...

What didn’t you like about Jonathan Marosz’s performance?

His voice does not distinguish between editorial and quotes which makes it hard to follow.

16 people found this helpful

I wanted to like this book...

What could have made this a 4 or 5-star listening experience for you?

...I really did want to like it. But having recently read Caro and Kearns Goodwin, I was expecting more insight as to who TR was as a person, not just a recap of his significant achievements and world events while he was in office. Theodore Rex comes across as more of a doctoral thesis than an biography: fact-filled and learned; but impersonal and lacking suspense. I learned a lot, no doubt, but I was sorely disappointed with the lack of detail on TR's thought processes, and what made him tic for the 7.5 years that he was the most powerful person on Earth.

How could the performance have been better?

Marosz has a voice for which many orators would kill. It is deep, smooth, and delicious like like a chocolate milk milkshake... And not the cheap ones you get from fast food joints - Marosz' voice is the Five Dollar Milkshake of voices. If I had a voice like his, my wife would force me to croon her to sleep every night... but only if I could change pitch every now and then, and that is a feat of which Marosz seems almost entirely incapable. There were times while driving down the road that I had to turn off the book because Marosz' monotonous tone nearly lulled me to sleep. Marosz sets up quotes with well-timed pauses, which is appreciated; but those are practically the only times the listener gets any break from the "Bueller, Bueller, Bueller"-esque droning. And, as with Morris' over-use of French throughout the book, I became just as annoyed with Marosz' "ejaculating" French phrases as though he were giving a tour at the Louvre. Please keep in mind, I am no anti-French-ite. I love escargot, Bordeaux, and French fries as much as the next guy. Foreign languages and culture make me smile. Marosz runs through French names and phrases without effort, to the point that I presume he speaks the language fluently. I am jealous. But where was that effort on the Spanish, German, Russian and Japanese names? I couldn't help but think he was showing off when he had the opportunity to use French, but made no effort whatsoever to learn how to pronounce the smattering of names from other languages. C'est une honte!

Any additional comments?

Morris is clearly an accomplished historian and I can only fathom the countless hours he put into this impressive compilation of historical facts and events. At times, however, I just couldn't help but feel like the book was over written. For example, I don't want to have to put down a book -- or in this case, pause the audio -- to stop and look up French words and phrases every 10 minutes. Okay: TR had some Frenchmen in and around his cabinet. Point taken. But I don't need a run down of every French dish he consumed over the course of 7 years. And, I especially do not need to references to anyone "ejaculating" words. Yes, I understand the word can be applied in different ways; but I would be "deee-lighted" if Morris would use a different word when he describes someone excreting a word.

All told, Theodore Rex is a phenomenal work of historical scholarship; but a rather boring story.

15 people found this helpful

Fantastic man, fantastic life, but meh narrator

Would you listen to Theodore Rex again? Why?

I would probably read this book again instead of listen to it because I thought the narrator was >>yawn<< boring. Monotonic, lacking any verbal dramatization of any speaker (especially TR), and employing a most annoying verbal habit of ending sentences with a rising tone? Yes. I was always waiting for the answer to his questions. Just kidding. But seriously, his rising tone at the end of sentences was truly annoying.

What did you like best about this story?

I liked TR the best about this story, of course! But more specifically, Morris' detailed, blow by blow recount of TR's life, inhabiting three extremely well written and extraordinarily researched tomes, bring TR's larger than life personality and his amazing life to bear in the most engaging, memorable way - by telling an extremely interesting story!

If you could give Theodore Rex a new subtitle, what would it be?

Further shaping America's place as a premier world power as the United States' Commander -in-Chief.

12 people found this helpful

How did they find such a poor narrator?

Would you try another book from Edmund Morris and/or Jonathan Marosz?

I would certainly buy another book from Morris, however I will avoid Marosz as a narrator. He has a horrible habit of drawing out random words much to long, speaks slowly and treats the text as if he is singing a song. Unfortunately, he seems to enjoy the sound of his voice more than the text he has been asked to read.

What did you like best about this story?

It helps me to better understand a period of American history that has been glossed over in all of my history classes, where we think of civil war, maybe a bit of the war of 1812, barely mention the Spanish American war, and then skip to WWI. This is very unfortunate since much of our current "Americanism" was originally developed during this period, as Morris shows.

Would you be willing to try another one of Jonathan Marosz’s performances?

No, he must be the worst narrator I have heard on audible.

20 people found this helpful

I wish I could give it 6 stars

This is the second part of Morris' three book series on Theodore Roosevelt(the third book is not yet written). Taken with part one, this is one of the best biographies that I have ever read or heard. Roosevelt was not only one of the greatest presidents of our countries history, but was also one of the most interesting and entertaining personalities our country has ever produced. A great book that could only be better when the first book is released unabridged, and when the third book is published.

34 people found this helpful

A man way ahead of his time

Theodore Roosevelt – what a guy!!! A whirlwind . A remarkable individual way, way, way ahead of his time. I recommend reading this book to those of you interested in all the details of his presidency AND to those of you who like reading about exceptional human beings. I cannot think of any other person at all similar. You must of course start with the first book of the trilogy: [book:The Rise of Theodore Roosevelt|40929]. This is the second, and I am off to read the third: [book:Colonel Roosevelt|7993566]. I know they are long, but they are worth it.

Should I list some of the remarkable things Theodore achieved during his presidency? Is that what you want to know? The Panama Canal, the Pennsylvanian coal strike settlement, negotiations to end the Russo-Japanese War and the Moroccan crisis of 1906 for which he received the Nobel Peace Prize, the National Conservation Conference and anti-trust legislation, to name but a few. By reading the book you will understand the magnitude of each accomplishment. You will understand how he pulled off these accomplishments and why he chose to do what he did. Who is Theodore Roosevelt? How did his mind tick? Was he brave? Was he moral? Was he impetuous? Yes, yes, yes! Did he make mistakes? Of course! Perhaps Brownsville was one. Read and judge for yourself.

Please read this book. You will be astounded by the exuberance of this man, by his intelligence and his morals. More than just discovering what he did you will discover how this man was under the surface. He is complicated. How could he be both a hunter and a conservationist? How did he balance might versus right, wealth versus labor’s demands? I cannot adequately explain how he looks on African-Americans. I’d have to write a book to explain this accurately, but that is not necessary since you have this book. You end up understanding not only what he did but who he was. Now, in the final book Theodore is off on a safari to Eastern Africa. I will be accompanying him and his son Kermit. What a guy! I don’t want to leave him.

I think this book isn’t quite as good as the first. I wanted to know more about his familial relationships, about his wife and children. There is a bit, but not enough. Maybe that is not the author’s fault. There is little information. Edith was reserved. Letters were destroyed. Privacy was kept. Or maybe I will get this in the next volume? I know that the narration by Nathan Marosz really made it difficult at times to pay attention to the words being read. His voice has a terrible sing-song lilt. He drew out in length the final words of a sentence. Then he pauses; it sounds terribly condescending! In any case the narration is completely inappropriate for Theodore who is known to have bitten off his words, spitting them out in a sharp staccato manner. Marosz mispronounces not only French, but German and even English words too. As you follow the amusing lines of the author, you can hardly appreciate the humor, the narration is so distracting. OK, Marosz did have me laughing, not at the author’s lines, but at the bizarre mispronunciations. Wait till you hear how he says the words liqueur, and Steiff (the stuffed teddy bears) and Slav. There was one French name that I was totally incapable of deciphering. Thankfully, both the first and the third books of the trilogy use the narrator Mark Deakins, and he does a magnificent job. Many times lines were read twice, but this, of course, is not the narrator’s fault. I kind of think it was the narration that made it so impossible for me to really enjoy this book as I should have, but at times I did feel just a little bit bored. My advice? If you cannot get the second volume narrated by Mark Deakins, read the paper book instead! You simply cannot hop over any of the books. They should be read together.

16 people found this helpful

Great book, but with some audio glitches

I've had this book sitting on a shelf for years intending to read it. Now that I have finally listened to it, I can say it more than lives up to the promise of Morris' first volume on Roosevelt, The Rise of Theodore Roosevelt. I give the book itself five stars. The recording, however, has a nasty audio glitch on Part 2 from 02:46:56 to 04:05:16, interference in the form of scratching and blurring that is terribly annoying. So I would give the audio no stars, which averages out to 2.5 stars overall. This is not the quality I have come to expect from audible.com. I will try to contact them about it, but in the meantime, caveat emptor.

13 people found this helpful

Good Story, Mediocre Production

The story overall is interesting and well-written. It picks up where Morris left off and continues in the same style. I felt like the previous book was more effusive towards Roosevelt implying that every move in his early career was genius whereas this book took a more moderated explaining things in a more neutral tone. As expected with Morris, the detail was astounding and all viewpoints were thoroughly explored.

The narrator took a chapter or two to get used to but I found him to be good. He didn't do the voices that I liked from the first book but his pacing was good and his enunciation was clear.

I did notice an audio issue where 20 to 25 second segments would be repeated immediately after they were initially read resulting in the same segment being read twice in a row. The timer kept moving so it appears it was part of the audio file itself. This happened maybe 20 times over the duration of the book and it was annoying each time.

5 people found this helpful

BULLY for Teddy the Übermensch!

A brilliant biography. IT is hard to separate my love of Morris' second Roosevelt biography from my love of TR. The book captures the dynamo-President's force, eccentricities, and political skill while also accurately capturing the politics of the time and the rise of America's global power. Occasionally a person enters the global stage with such energy, power, competence and audacity that it seems the earth moves for them and water separates. I can only think of a couple other leaders that capture the Nietzsche' Übermensch ideal (Napoleon, Fredrick the Great, Alexander, Caesar, etc) as well. Even when Teddy wasn't super, he was still super lucky.

15 people found this helpful

A great biography continued, a reader that leaves you wanting.

Edmund Morris seems to be the PERFECT person to write a biography about TR. He is both eloquent and colorful. My only criticism is the reader. The first reader employed different impressions of people (most notably TR) which colored the biography and made it come alive. This reader just...reads. He has a great voice, pronounces words well, but he does not do many impressions like the first reader.

3 people found this helpful